When assessing the efficacy of androgen receptor-targeted brokers (ARTAs) or chemotherapy in sufferers with metastatic castration-resistant prostate most cancers (mCRPC), new analysis reveals vital variations between prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) analysis and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response.
For the retrospective research, lately revealed within the European Journal of Radiology, researchers in contrast PSMA PET/CT with the imaging agent (18F)PSMA-1007 PET/CT (Pylarify, Lantheus) versus PSA response in 31 sufferers with mCRPC who had been handled with ARTAs (enzalutamide or abiraterone) and 29 sufferers with mCRPC handled with chemotherapy (docetaxel or cabazitaxel).
When assessing therapy effectiveness, the researchers discovered discordant outcomes between PSMA PET/CT and PSA response in 47 p.c of the cohort. In 89 p.c of those instances, PSMA PET/CT revealed worse therapy response, in accordance with the research authors. Amongst sufferers who had better than a 50 p.c lower in PSA ranges after therapy, the research authors identified that 31 p.c demonstrated progressive prostate most cancers (PCa) on PSMA PET/CT scans.
Right here one can see a PSMA PET/CT baseline scan (B), one taken 4 months after initiating enzalutamide therapy for metastatic castration-resistant prostate most cancers (mCRPC) (C) and a scan taken six months after commencing enzalutamide (D) for a 72-yeat-old affected person. Whereas the affected person had an 86 p.c decline in his PSA stage at 4 months, the four-month PSMA PET/CT scan revealed over six new lesions and the six-month scan confirmed over 10 new lesions. (Photos courtesy of the European Journal of Radiology.)
The researchers additionally famous that PSMA PET/CT was a greater predictor of total survival (hazard ratio (HR) of 4.05) compared to PSA response (HR of two.53) for sufferers on this cohort.
“These outcomes counsel that the superior predictive capacity of PSMA PET/CT is because of its capacity to detect progressive illness sooner than PSA in a big proportion of sufferers,” wrote research co-author Linda Heijmen, M.D., who’s affiliated with the Division of Radiology within the Part of Nuclear Drugs at Leiden College Medical Middle in Leiden, the Netherlands, and colleagues.
The research authors emphasised that the improved accuracy of PSMA PET/CT in reflecting the course of mCRPC after therapy has vital implications within the administration of those sufferers.
Three Key Takeaways
1. Superior predictive capacity of PSMA PET/CT. PSMA PET/CT demonstrated higher accuracy in predicting therapy outcomes in comparison with PSA response in sufferers with metastatic castration-resistant prostate most cancers (mCRPC). PSMA PET/CT detected progressive illness sooner than PSA in a big variety of sufferers.
2. Excessive discordance between PSMA PET/CT and PSA response. The research discovered a 47 p.c discordance fee between PSMA PET/CT analysis and PSA response, with 89 p.c of those instances displaying worse outcomes on PSMA PET/CT regardless of PSA responses.
3. Implications for therapy choices. The superior sensitivity of PSMA PET/CT permits for extra correct evaluation of therapy efficacy, resulting in earlier discontinuation of ineffective therapies, lowering toxicity and price, and probably enhancing affected person survival by enabling well timed initiation of efficient therapies.
“The systematic use of PSMA PET/CT for therapy response analysis can permit for earlier discontinuation of ineffective therapies, (minimizing) pointless toxicity and prices, and offering the chance to provoke probably efficient therapy earlier in these sufferers. It could additionally permit for continuation of therapy in these sufferers with the best survival profit,” maintained Heijmen and colleagues.
Noting that that is the primary research to judge the usage of (18F)PSMA-1007 to evaluate mCRPC therapy, the researchers famous key benefits over 68Ga-labelled radiotracer brokers when it comes to an extended half-life and enhanced spatial decision. In addition they cautioned a few increased danger of unspecific uptake in bone that may result in false positives with (18F)PSMA-1007.
(Editor’s be aware: For associated content material, see “Section 3 Examine Reveals Viability of 177Lu-PSMA-617 for Taxane-Naïve Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Most cancers,” “Mixture Remedy with Enzalutamide Yields 31 P.c Enchancment in Radiological Development-Free Survival for mCRPC” and “Rising PSMA Radioligand Remedy Reveals Advantages for Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Most cancers.”)
In regard to review limitations, the authors famous the retrospective design and the small cohort of 60 sufferers. In addition they acknowledged the absence of diagnostic computed tomography or bone scans, and that affected person enrollment was restricted to sufferers with mCRPC who had been handled with androgen receptor-targeted brokers (ARTAs) and taxane-based chemotherapy.
