Noting that correct contouring can play a key position within the administration and remedy of prostate most cancers, the authors of a brand new examine recommend that synthetic intelligence (AI)-assisted contouring gives higher accuracy than hemigland contouring and guide contouring with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
For the multireader retrospective examine, lately printed within the Journal of Urology, researchers in contrast AI-assisted contouring (Unfold AI, Avenda Well being) — which contains MRI findings and medical elements similar to prostate-specific antigen (PSA) ranges and biopsy outcomes — with hemigland contouring and cognitive standard-of-care (SOC) contouring in 50 instances of sufferers who had a radical prostatectomy.
The ten reviewing physicians (three radiologists and 7 urologist) carried out cognitive contouring and subsequently utilized the AI software program for contouring on the identical instances 4 weeks later, in accordance with the examine.
On this case involving clinically important prostate most cancers (csPCa) and a comparability of standard-of-care (SOC) contours, hemigland most cancers contours and AI-assisted contour, researchers famous a imply balanced accuracy of 64 % for SOC, 77.7 % for hemigland contours and 87.5 % for AI-assisted most cancers contours. (Photographs courtesy of the Journal of Urology.)
The researchers discovered that AI-assisted contouring had a balanced accuracy price of 84.7 % in distinction to 75.9 for hemigland contouring and 67.2 % for cognitively outlined contouring. Using AI-assisted contouring had comparable sensitivity to hemigland contouring (97.4 % vs. 98.4 % however had an almost 60 % larger sensitivity price than cognitive SOC contouring (38.2 %), in accordance with the examine authors.
Whereas cognitive SOC contouring provided the best specificity price (96.2 % vs. 72.1 % for adjunctive AI and 53.4 % for hemigland contouring), it additionally had a considerably decrease destructive margin price (1.6 %) in distinction to adjunctive AI (72.8 %) and hemigland contouring (86 %).
“(Adjunctive AI) was considerably extra correct than hemigland and SOC contours, indicating a greater stability between sensitivity and specificity. Moreover, publicity to AI software program inspired physicians to outline bigger and extra patient-specific contours, enhancing the destructive margin price. When AI software program was utilized in our examine inhabitants, the destructive margin price rose from 1.6% to 72.8% — a 45-fold improve,” wrote lead writer Sakina Mohammed Mota, M.D,. a knowledge scientist with Avenda Well being, and colleagues.
(Editor’s notice: For associated content material, see “Examine Says AI Mapping Extra Efficient than MRI for Assessing Extent of Prostate Most cancers,” “FDA Clears AI ‘Contouring Assistant’ in MRI-Guided Ultrasound Ablation Procedures” and “MRI-Based mostly Deep Studying Algorithm Reveals Comparable Detection of csPCa to Radiologists.”)
Three Key Takeaways
1. Elevated accuracy with AI-assisted contouring. AI-assisted contouring demonstrated larger accuracy (84.7 %) in comparison with hemigland contouring (75.9 %) and cognitive SOC contouring (67.2 %). This means AI can enhance the precision of prostate most cancers remedy planning by higher balancing sensitivity and specificity.
2. Improved destructive margin charges. Using AI software program considerably elevated the destructive margin price from 1.6 % with cognitive SOC contouring to 72.8 %. This means that AI-assisted contouring could result in simpler and safer surgical outcomes by serving to outline extra correct tumor boundaries.
3. Enhanced remedy suggestions: The introduction of AI-assisted contouring led to modifications in remedy suggestions in over 25 % of instances. Notably, it resulted in a 9 % improve within the suggestion for focal remedy, suggesting that AI can help extra focused and fewer invasive remedy choices for prostate most cancers.
The researchers additionally identified that the adjunctive AI software program’s specificity benefit over hemigland contouring (72.1 % vs. 53.4 %) is a big consideration with respect to focused, environment friendly remedy of prostate most cancers.
“Although the sensitivity of AI and hemigland contours had been comparable, AI contours had been smaller and extra particular. It’s due to this fact believable that AI could facilitate quicker remedy with fewer negative effects, significantly as a result of hemigland ablation entails deadly remedy in shut proximity to the urethra, exterior sphincter, and ipsilateral nerve bundle,” added Mota and colleagues. “Avoidance of those buildings, although frequent in medical implementation, would scale back hemigland contour dimension and sure compromise their efficacy for a subset of instances.”
The researchers additionally famous that adjunctive AI modified remedy suggestions in over 25 % of instances with a notable 9 % change in urologists recommending focal remedy (imply of 21.5 % with adjunctive AI vs. 12.5 % primarily based on SOC contouring).
“The most cancers estimation map improved confidence in recommending focal remedy over complete gland remedy, with urologists trending in direction of a extra focused strategy,” famous Mota and colleagues.
In regard to check limitations, the authors acknowledged the reviewed instances had been derived from one establishment and completely drawn from sufferers who had radical prostatectomy procedures. The researchers famous the efficiency of hemigland contours could have been inflated as a consequence of limiting the cohort to these with apparently unilateral most cancers.
